# Issues with linear buckling analysis following ASME PTB-2022 example problem

**URL:** <https://prepomax.discourse.group/t/issues-with-linear-buckling-analysis-following-asme-ptb-2022-example-problem/3080>\
**Category:** General Questions\
**Tags:** results\
**Created:** [November 10, 2025, 4:08am UTC](https://prepomax.discourse.group/t/issues-with-linear-buckling-analysis-following-asme-ptb-2022-example-problem/3080 "2025-11-10T04:08:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 30

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FEAnalyst](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/prepomax.discourse.group/feanalyst/32/688_2.png) [@FEAnalyst](https://prepomax.discourse.group/u/FEAnalyst)\
**Post date:** [November 11, 2025, 10:40pm UTC](https://prepomax.discourse.group/t/issues-with-linear-buckling-analysis-following-asme-ptb-2022-example-problem/3080/30 "2025-11-11T22:40:19Z")

</div>

Well, the imperial units for density are indeed weird. But they were fixed in PrePoMax quite some time ago: [Density to Mass Conversion (Modal Analysis)](https://prepomax.discourse.group/t/density-to-mass-conversion-modal-analysis/227)

---

_[View the full topic](https://prepomax.discourse.group/t/issues-with-linear-buckling-analysis-following-asme-ptb-2022-example-problem/3080)._