# Custom field output

**URL:** <https://prepomax.discourse.group/t/custom-field-output/2917>\
**Category:** General Questions\
**Created:** [August 8, 2025, 5:06pm UTC](https://prepomax.discourse.group/t/custom-field-output/2917 "2025-08-08T17:06:51Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FEAnalyst](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/prepomax.discourse.group/feanalyst/32/688_2.png) [@FEAnalyst](https://prepomax.discourse.group/u/FEAnalyst)\
**Post date:** [August 8, 2025, 6:50pm UTC](https://prepomax.discourse.group/t/custom-field-output/2917/2 "2025-08-08T18:50:47Z")

</div>

How about this approach: [Random vibration analysis of a cantilever beam - #2 by FEAnalyst](https://prepomax.discourse.group/t/random-vibration-analysis-of-a-cantilever-beam/2289/2) ?

Might be good to ask on the CalculiX forum too. Some guys there dealt with similar issues. Here’s an example (response spectrum analyses): [Shock Response Spectrum - Is there a workaround? - CalculiX (official versions are on www.calculix.de, the official GitHub repository is at https://github.com/Dhondtguido/CalculiX).](https://calculix.discourse.group/t/shock-response-spectrum-is-there-a-workaround/2460)

Also, it seems that Code\_Aster supports random vibration analyses.

---

_[View the full topic](https://prepomax.discourse.group/t/custom-field-output/2917)._